Setting
The miraculous healing that just took place at the temple drew a great multitude to the apostles, who grasped the opportunity to preach Jesus Christ. Immediately, opposition arose. The religious rulers arrested the apostles, brought them into their council, and forbade them to preach the name of Jesus. Nevertheless, the apostles and the church withstood the test of faith, found courage in the Lord, and became even more dauntless in preaching the word.
Did You Know...?
1. Captain of the temple (4:1): “A member of one of the leading priestly families; next in rank to the high priest (see 5:24,26; Lk 22:4, 52).”
[ref]
“[He] was not a military officer, but superintendent of the guard of priests and Levites who kept watch in the temple by night.”
[ref]
2. Sadducees (4:1): A Jewish sect that comprised of priestly descendants, who also controlled the temple. The Sadducees did not believe in the resurrection of the dead or a personal Messiah. They held that the Messianic age had already come and must be preserved. The high priest, who was a Sadducee, presided over the Sanhedrin (see 5:17; 23:6-8; Mt 22:23-33).
[ref]
3. Evening (4:3): When the evening sacrifices ended at about 4:00 PM, the temple gates would be closed. Any judgments involving life and death must be take place during daylight hours.
[ref]
4. Rulers, elders, and scribes (4:5): These three groups formed the Sanhedrin. “Rulers” was frequently a synonym for “the high priests.”
[ref]
5. Annas (4:6) “was high priest A.D. 7-14. In A.D. 25 Caiaphas, who had married the daughter of Annas (John 18:13), was raised to that office, and probably Annas was now made president of the Sanhedrin, or deputy or coadjutor of the high priest, and thus was also called high priest along with Caiaphas (Luke 3:2). By the Mosaic law the high-priesthood was held for life (Numbers 3:10); and although Annas had been deposed by the Roman procurator, the Jews may still have regarded him as legally the high priest. Our Lord was first brought before Annas, and after a brief questioning of him (John 18:19-23) was sent to Caiaphas… Annas was president of the Sanhedrin before which Peter and John were brought (Acts 4:6).”
[ref]
6. Caiaphas (4:6) was Annas’ son-in-law, who was high priest for eighteen years (A.D. 18-36).
7. John (4:6): This may be Jonathan son of Annas, who was appointed high priest in A.D. 36 to replace Caiaphas.
8. Herod (4:27): Herod Antipas, tetrarch of Galilee and Perea (cf. Lk 23:7-12).
9. Chief Cornerstone (4:11): This was the most significant stone in the building because it determined the building’s design and orientation.
[ref]
The corner foundation stone was acquired, moved, and laid at great cost and care. “Hillyer mentions one stone in a quarry that was sixty-nine feet by twelve feet by thirteen feet…”
[ref]
10. Council/Sanhedrin (4:15): “The Sanhedrin (synedrion, “council”) was the senate and supreme court of the nation, which had jurisdiction in all noncapital cases–though it also advised the Roman governors in capital cases–and in one case, viz., that of Gentiles trespassing beyond the posted barriers into the inner courts of the temple, could on its own sentence even a Roman citizen to death (cf. 21:28-29; Jos. War VI, 124-28 [ii.4]). The Sanhedrin consisted of the high priest, who by virtue of his office was president, and seventy others, made up of members of the high priestly families, a few influential persons of various formal ideological allegiances or backgrounds within Judaism, and professional experts in the law drawn from both Sadducean and Pharisaic ranks. It was dominated by the Sadducees and probably came together mostly at their request. It met in a hall adjoining the southwest part of the temple area, probably at the eastern end of a bridge spanning the Tyropean Valley and next to an open-air meeting place called the Xystos (cf. Jos. War II, 344 [xvi.3]; V, 144 [iv. 2]; VI, 354 [vi.2]).”
[ref]
Outline
General Analysis
Segment Analysis
-
4:1-4
1a. How did the religious leaders react to Peter’s and John’s preaching?
-
1b. Why did they react this way?
-
4:5-12
2a. What did the council question Peter and John about?
-
2b. What was the main point of Peter’s reply?
-
2c. What was the point of quoting Psalm 118:22?
-
3a. Why are the words of verse 12 a stumbling block for many people today?
-
3b. Why must we continue to preach the same message despite people’s objections? Do you truly believe in the truth of this message?
-
4. How did the Holy Spirit help Peter at this moment? What does this tell you about the work of the Holy Spirit?
-
4:13-22
5. Why did the council marvel at Peter and John? What made it evident that “they had been with Jesus”?
-
6a. Why was the council not able to find any way to punish Peter and John?
-
6b. What did the council decide to do in the end?
-
7. How did these leaders’ actions show their callousness? Why do you think they were so hard-hearted?
-
8a. How did the apostles respond to the council’s threats?
-
8b. How does their response teach us about an important principle in our conduct?
-
9a. What had Peter and John seen and heard that they could not but speak about?
-
9b. Do you feel compelled to speak about what you have seen and heard? What makes a person compelled to witness?
-
4:23-31
10. How did the church respond to the opposition of the religious leaders, who had just outlawed preaching in Jesus’ name?
-
11. What do we observe about the church here that can serve as good examples for the church today?
-
12. The believers recalled of the prophecy in the Psalms about the opposition against the Christ. What was their understanding about and attitude towards the forces of opposition? What can we learn from them?
-
13. Based on the believers’ prayer, what two things can we ask for in our prayer when the work of preaching is being hindered? How will they help in advancing the gospel?
-
14. What was the effect of the prayer?