Setting
Paul’s speech had infuriated the crowd. The commander hoped to examine Paul under scourging, only to find out that Paul was a Roman citizen, who was protected under Roman law from being bound or scourged before being found guilty. On the next day, the commander had Paul stand before the Jewish council to find out the reason for the Jews’ accusations. He would soon discover that the accusations against Paul were not deserving of death or chains, but were only matters concerning the Jewish law.
Key Verse
(23:11)
Did You Know...?
1 Scourging (22:24): Scourging was commonly used to question a prisoner. The prisoner was stripped, tied to a post, and whipped. While whipping a prisoner, a Roman soldier was restricted by nothing but his strength and whim. If whipped severely, the flesh was reduced to a bloody pulp.
[ref]
2. “Is it lawful for you to scourge a man who is a Roman?” (22:25): Roman law guaranteed the citizens numerous rights and privileges, including immunity from scourging and crucifixion. The commander had broken the law and was subject to punishment when he ordered that Paul be flogged (a fact the commander later conveniently forgot to mention in his letter to Felix [cf. 23:27]).
[ref]
3. “With a large sum I obtained this citizenship” (22:28): Roman citizenship was granted only by birth or by reward; it could not be bought for a fee, but for a bribe. The commander was probably implying, “How can someone as sorry-looking as you afford the price for citizenship?”
[ref]
4. “I was born a citizen” (22:28): A verbal claim to Roman citizenship was accepted at face value; there were stiff penalties (including death) for making a false claim of citizenship. Paul was a rare individual, to be an educated, intelligent, and devout Jew who was also a Roman citizen by birth.
[ref]
5. Sanhedrin (22:30): The 71-member Jewish high court, which originated from the council of Moses and the 70 elders (cf. Num 11:16-17). It was composed of chief priests, elders, and scribes, and was headed by the high priest. The Sanhedrin was given much authority in religious and civil affairs.
[ref]
6. Ananias (23:2): Not to be confused with other men of the same name (such as in 5:1-5 and 9:10-17). He was the high priest at the time. A Sadducee, he was wealthy, arrogant, unscrupulous, filling his sacred office for selfish and political ends. Later, he traveled to Caesarea to accuse Paul before Felix (cf. 24:1). Shortly after Felix left the province, Ananias was deposed. He was later assassinated.
7. “Whitewashed wall” (23:3): Paul’s rebuke is similar to that of Jesus’ against the scribes and Pharisees in Matthew 23:27.
8. “I did not know that he was the high priest” (23:5): This remark has greatly puzzled biblical scholars, because the high priest was easily identified by his position and official seat as president of the Sanhedrin. Some take the words as ironic (“I didn’t think that anyone who acted in such a manner could be the high priest!”) Others assume that due to Paul’s poor eyesight he did not know who had ordered him to be struck. Perhaps Paul was indeed apologizing for his outburst (“For a moment, I did not bear in mind that I was addressing the high priest.”)
[ref]
9. Sadducees (23:6): A Jewish political party composed of mostly priests and the upper class who generally cooperated with the Roman authorities. Though smaller and less popular than the Pharisees (cf. Did You Know #10), they occupied influential positions on the Sanhedrin. Because they accepted the authority of only the five books of Moses, they rejected the Pharisees’ oral traditions as well as the doctrines of the resurrection, future judgment, and angels and spirits.
[ref]
10. Pharisees (23:6): Literally, “Separated Ones.” They were teachers in the synagogues, religious examples in the eyes of the people, and self-appointed guardians of the law and its proper observance. They considered the interpretations and regulations handed down by tradition to be virtually as authoritative as the Scripture.
[ref]
Outline
General Analysis
-
1. How were Paul’s experience in this passage similar/different to those of Jesus (cf. Mt 26:59-67)?
-
2. Give examples of God’s law that you obey without a second thought (like the Roman soldiers who obeyed their laws). Give examples of God’s law that you have trouble obeying (like the religious leaders who violated their laws for personal gain).
Segment Analysis
-
22:22-23
1a. Why did the crowd reject Paul’s words?
-
1b. Today, how might we have similar attitudes?
-
22:24-29
2. Why was the Roman commander puzzled at why the crowd was shouting at Paul?
-
3. What does verse 29 tell you about respect of the law in the Roman Empire?
-
4. With respect to the law, how were the Roman soldiers better than the members of the Sanhedrin?
-
5a. When we believe in Jesus Christ, we become citizens of the household of God (cf. Eph 2:19; Phil 3:20). What are the laws of the heavenly kingdom?
-
5b. What are your rights and privileges as a citizen of heaven?
-
5c. What are your duties as a citizen of heaven?
-
22:30-23:11
6a. What does it mean to live in all good conscience? Why is it important to do so “before God?”
-
6b. Do you live in all good conscience before God?
-
7. Why did the high priest command that Paul be struck on the mouth?
-
8. In 23:5, why did Paul quote a law of Moses (cf. Ex 22:28)?
-
9. What was Paul trying to achieve when he said, “I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee; concerning the hope and resurrection of the dead I am being judged!” (23:6)? What does this teach you about what to do in a difficult situation?
-
10a. Why do you think the Lord appear to Paul (11)?
-
10b. When you preach the gospel and are rejected, how can you still “be of good cheer”?
-
10c. How has Jesus Christ affirmed your work? How has He given you a sense of direction in your life?
-
23:12-22
11. Describe the Roman commander in your own words.
-
12. Has a non-Christian ever been a valuable help to you? What does this teach you about how God works through the kindness of others?